To start, let me remind all my readers that this is my
personal blog and represents my opinions only. I heard a part of an interview
on Good Friday last between Mr Adrian Cummins of the Restaurant Association of
Ireland (RAI) and one of the lunchtime news presenters on RTÉ Radio 1. Mt
Cummins was presenting a case for the removal of the ban on selling alcohol on
Good Friday; when the presenter pointed out “You’ll make the money yesterday
and tomorrow, won’t you?”
Hmmm. Let me state that I do not believe that there any
unanswerable grounds for the removal of the Good Friday ban but I was quite
taken aback at this comment. It assumes for RAI members a great deal of
responsibility. Apparently, they are the sole arbiters of who may drink and
where they may drink. It assumes that drinking at home is some form of
abomination and should be discouraged at all costs - "unregulated" was the word used. Hmmm – so does that mean
that Tesco, Dunnes, Lidl and Aldi, for example, should not only be banned from
selling on Good Friday but on all days of the year? Seems the logical thing to
do since Mr Cummins assures us that drinking in restaurants is the only way to
consume alcohol.
Perhaps he might respond by saying that’s not what he meant
but it is the logical conclusion of that specific remark. Those of you who know
debating will know the device reductio ad
absurdam: if you can arrive logically at an absurd conclusion using your
opponent’s arguments then your opponent’s premiss must itself be absurd.
I also heard on the Last Word on TodayFM a senator arguing the same
point – her premiss was that since Easter is the second busiest retail period
of the year then something is being lost due to the ban. I couldn’t quite
follow her arguments but she was opposed by a member of the Pioneers, a group
with which I share few values, whose argument was based on a set of consistent
religious beliefs. His counter-argument had more logical weight than hers; it
seemed she wanted us to be greedy and sell as much as we can every day of the
year.
Why do I not support a lifting of the ban? I see no
commercial benefit to it. In the shops in which I have worked over the years
the Easter weekend is typically busier than previous weekends, even with one
day missing. This year the Wicklow Wine Company (where I work) had an 18.47%
increase in business on Holy Thursday and Easter Saturday over the previous
Thursday, Friday and Saturday.
Why MUST we sell alcohol every day? Tourists is the usual
answer – well I have been to dry towns in dry counties in dry states in the US
where you cannot buy alcohol at all, any day! Have I suffered immeasurable
damage as a result? No! Will a French, German, American or any other tourist be
unable to survive a day in Ireland without the soothing benefits of a pint of
stout? Of course they will!
My boss has two small children and so Good Friday affords
him a day with the kids which he might not otherwise have had; it also affords
staff in pubs and off-licences a day of rest, which I am sure most appreciate
greatly. Of course, any business is free to open on Good Friday so long as no
alcohol is sold so all members of the RAI can open if they wish. Why the
absolute need to sell alcohol? Is this the attitude of those who offer
“regulated drinking” and who apparently have the nation’s health foremost in
their minds? Hmmmm.
No comments:
Post a Comment